Psychiatric Services
Journal Home Search Current Issue Past Issues Subscribe All APPI Journals Help Contact Us
 
Psychiatr Serv 57:1406-1415, October 2006
doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.57.10.1406
© 2006 American Psychiatric Association
Quicksearch
Advanced Search
Or Search All APPI Journals
This Article
* Full Text
* Full Text (PDF)
* Additional cluster analyses
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me if a correction is posted
* Citation Map
Services
* Email this article to a Colleague
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Articles & Searches
* Download to citation manager
* reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via HighWire
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by Macias, C.
* Articles by Wang, Q.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by Macias, C.
* Articles by Wang, Q.
Related Collections
* Community Residential Facilities
* Skills Training
*Related Articles

Article

Supported Employment Outcomes of a Randomized Controlled Trial of ACT and Clubhouse Models

Cathaleene Macias, Ph.D., Charles F. Rodican, M.S.W., William A. Hargreaves, Ph.D., Danson R. Jones, Ph.D., Paul J. Barreira, M.D. and Qi Wang, Ph.D.

OBJECTIVE: In a randomized controlled trial, a vocationally integrated program of assertive community treatment (ACT) was compared with a certified clubhouse in the delivery of supported employment services. METHODS: Employment rates, total work hours, and earnings for 121 adults with serious mental illness interested in work were compared with published benchmark figures for exemplary supported employment programs. The two programs were then compared on service engagement, retention, and employment outcomes in regression analyses that controlled for background characteristics, program preference, and vocational service receipt. RESULTS: Outcomes for 63 ACT and 58 clubhouse participants met or exceeded most published outcomes for specialized supported employment teams. Compared with the clubhouse program, the ACT program had significantly (p<.05) better service engagement (ACT, 98 percent; clubhouse, 74 percent) and retention (ACT, 79 percent; clubhouse, 58 percent) over 24 months, but there was no significant difference in employment rates (ACT, 64 percent; clubhouse, 47 percent). Compared with ACT participants, clubhouse participants worked significantly longer (median of 199 days versus 98 days) for more total hours (median of 494 hours versus 234 hours) and earned more (median of $3,456 versus $1,252 total earnings). Better work performance by clubhouse participants was partially attributable to higher pay. CONCLUSIONS: Vocationally integrated ACT and certified clubhouses can achieve employment outcomes similar to those of exemplary supported employment teams. Certified clubhouses can effectively provide supported employment along with other rehabilitative services, and the ACT program can ensure continuous integration of supported employment with clinical care.


Related Articles:

October 2006: This Month's Highlight
Psychiatr Serv 2006 57: 1369. [Full Text] [PDF]

Commentary: Policy Priorities and Shifting Sands in the Supported Employment Evidence Base
David S. Salkever
Psychiatr Serv 2006 57: 1440. [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Adv. Psychiatr. Treat.Home page
M. Rinaldi, R. Perkins, E. Glynn, T. Montibeller, M. Clenaghan, and J. Rutherford
Individual placement and support: from research to practice
Adv. Psychiatr. Treat., January 1, 2008; 14(1): 50 - 60.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Get information about faster international access.

Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2006 American Psychiatric Association. All rights reserved.

Home | Search | Current Issue | Past Issues | Subscribe | All APPI Journals | Help | Contact Us

American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc. American Psychiatric Association
1000 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1825, Arlington, VA 22209-3901 * 800-368-5777 * appi at psych.org