
Psychiatr Serv 57:1370-1372, October 2006
doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.57.10.1370
© 2006 American Psychiatric Association
Law & Psychiatry: Insanity, Guilty Minds, and Psychiatric Testimony
Paul S. Appelbaum, M.D.
Abstract
This column describes a recent Supreme Court case, Clark v. Arizona, in which an adolescent who had schizophrenia was convicted of first-degree murder of a police officer who he believed was a hostile space alien. The Arizona courts had rejected his insanity defense as well as a second defense that he lacked the required intent to commit the crime (mens rea) because his delusions interfered with his knowing that the victim was a police officer. The Court ultimately declined to overturn Arizona's rules regarding the insanity defense and mens rea. However, the column highlights the points in Justice Sou-ter's decision that may have implications for any case involving mental health issues.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. S. Appelbaum
Law & Psychiatry: Through a Glass Darkly: Functional Neuroimaging Evidence Enters the Courtroom
Psychiatr Serv,
January 1, 2009;
60(1):
21 - 23.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. L. Knoll IV
The Recurrence of an Illusion: The Concept of "Evil" in Forensic Psychiatry
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law,
March 1, 2008;
36(1):
105 - 116.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Get information about faster international access.
a>
Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2006
American Psychiatric Association.
All rights reserved.
Home
| Search
| Current Issue
| Past Issues
| Subscribe
| All APPI Journals
| Help
| Contact Us
|