Psychiatr Serv 50:1021-1027, August 1999
© 1999 American Psychiatric Association
Prevalence, Assessment, and Treatment of Pathological Gambling: A Review
Nancy M. Petry, Ph.D. and
Christopher Armentano, M.S.W.
OBJECTIVE: Although pathological gambling is an increasing problem, many mental health providers are unfamiliar with its diagnosis and treatment. To improve recognition and treatment of pathological gambling, the authors reviewed the literature on its prevalence, assessment, and treatment. METHODS: Entries in PsycLIT and MEDLINE were examined for the years 1984 to 1998. Results and discussion: The prevalence of pathological gambling seems to be increasing with the spread of legalized gambling; casinos are now operating in 27 states. Point and lifetime prevalence rates of pathological gambling are reported to be as high as 1.4 percent and 5.1 percent, respectively. The most commonly used assessment instrument is the DSM-based, 20-item South Oaks Gambling Screen. There is no standard treatment for pathological gambling. Gamblers Anonymous (GA) is the most popular intervention, and about 1,000 chapters exist in the U.S. Studies suggest that only 8 percent of GA attendees achieve a year of abstinence. Combining professional therapy and GA participation may improve retention and abstinence. Marital and family treatments, including participation in Gam-Anon, the spousal component of GA, have not been sufficiently evaluated. The few studies of cognitive-behavioral treatments suggest that this approach, which may include cognitive restructuring, problem solving, social skills training, and relapse prevention, is promising. Carbamazepine, naltrexone, clomipramine, fluvoxamine, and lithium have been used with some effect. Therapists' manuals and self-help manuals are available. Although research evaluating their efficacy is necessary, manuals can provide a start for therapists who encounter patients with gambling problems. Brief motivational interviewing may be a useful strategy for decreasing gambling among heavy gamblers who are ambivalent about entering treatment or who do not desire abstinence.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
|
|
 
D. Lipinski, J. P. Whelan, and A. W. Meyers
Treatment of Pathological Gambling Using a Guided Self-Change Approach
Clinical Case Studies,
October 1, 2007;
6(5):
394 - 411.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. M. Ledgerwood, J. Weinstock, B. J. Morasco, and N. M. Petry
Clinical Features and Treatment Prognosis of Pathological Gamblers With and Without RecentGambling-Related Illegal Behavior
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law,
September 1, 2007;
35(3):
294 - 301.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. A. Cunningham
Little Use of Treatment Among Problem Gamblers
Psychiatr Serv,
August 1, 2005;
56(8):
1024 - 1025.
[Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. C. Rotter
Curing Problem or Pathological Gambling: Don't Bet on It
The Family Journal,
January 1, 2004;
12(1):
37 - 39.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Boutin, M. Dumont, R. Ladouceur, and P. Montecalvo
Excessive Gambling and Cognitive Therapy: How to Address Ambivalence
Clinical Case Studies,
October 1, 2003;
2(4):
259 - 269.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. M. Petry
A Comparison of Young, Middle-Aged, and Older Adult Treatment-Seeking Pathological Gamblers
Gerontologist,
February 1, 2002;
42(1):
92 - 99.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
Get information about faster international access.
Privacy Policy
Copyright © 1999
American Psychiatric Association.
All rights reserved.
Home
| Search
| Current Issue
| Past Issues
| Subscribe
| All APPI Journals
| Help
| Contact Us
|
