Psychiatric Services
Journal Home Search Current Issue Past Issues Subscribe All APPI Journals Help Contact Us
 
Quicksearch
Advanced Search
Or Search All APPI Journals
This Article
* Full Text
* Full Text (PDF)
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me if a correction is posted
* Citation Map
Services
* Email this article to a Colleague
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Articles & Searches
* Download to citation manager
* reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via HighWire
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by Rosenheck, R. A.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by Rosenheck, R. A.
Related Collections
* Chronically Mentally Ill Patients
* Other Economics Issues
* Other Ethics Issues
* Access to Services
* Health Policy and Legislation
Psychiatr Serv 50:653-658, May 1999
© 1999 American Psychiatric Association


Article on Care in the Least Well Off

Principles for Priority Setting in Mental Health Services and Their Implications for the Least Well Off

Robert A. Rosenheck, M.D.

Funding for mental health services has declined in recent years, posing the difficult challenge of setting program and individual client service priorities with reduced resources. The author reviews seven principles for resource allocation and their potential impact on people with severe and persistent mental illness. These principles address issues of the autonomy of individual health care needs; the need for client, stakeholder, and provider input into goal setting; cost-effectiveness; equity and fairness; client responsibility for making effective use of services; the impact of private industry on the development and marketing of new treatments; and the importance of considering local skill availability and population needs in setting program priorities. Because none of these principles take precedence over the others, their joint application does not necessarily yield consistent program priorities. However, they provide a frame of reference for approaching the task of priority setting and for understanding why priorities may vary from different perspectives.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. PsychiatryHome page
G. Andrews, C. Issakidis, K. Sanderson, J. Corry, and H. Lapsley
Utilising survey data to inform public policy: comparison of the cost-effectiveness of treatment of ten mental disorders
The British Journal of Psychiatry, June 1, 2004; 184(6): 526 - 533.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Psychiatr. Serv.Home page
K. Sanderson and G. Andrews
Prevalence and Severity of Mental Health-Related Disability and Relationship to Diagnosis
Psychiatr Serv, January 1, 2002; 53(1): 80 - 86.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
AJPHHome page
P. S. Wang, O. Demler, and R. C. Kessler
Adequacy of Treatment for Serious Mental Illness in the United States
Am J Public Health, January 1, 2002; 92(1): 92 - 98.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Psychiatr. Serv.Home page
R. C. Christensen
The Mentally Ill Poor: Rethinking Ethics
Psychiatr Serv, November 1, 2000; 51 (11): 1452 - 1453.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eval Health ProfHome page
L. A. Melchior, A. T. Panter, T. A. Larson, K. L. Meredith, K. Richardson-Nassif, and G. J. Huba
Key Elements for Implementing Comprehensive Health Care Models for Persons with HIV: A Stakeholder Analysis
Eval Health Prof, September 1, 2000; 23(3): 264 - 283.
[Abstract] [PDF]




Get information about faster international access.

Privacy Policy

Copyright © 1999 American Psychiatric Association. All rights reserved.

Home | Search | Current Issue | Past Issues | Subscribe | All APPI Journals | Help | Contact Us

American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc. American Psychiatric Association
1000 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1825, Arlington, VA 22209-3901 * 800-368-5777 * appi at psych.org